A summary of two open-ended questions is also included below. Then it drops noticeably to Presentation, SuperLab, ERTS, and finally SuperLab Pro and NESU.
E-Prime, both flavors of PsyScope, and DMDX are highly recommended.
#Psyscope pro mac os
People are running away from PsyScope classic, probably because the classic Mac OS is very quickly approaching end-of-life. PsyScope X has the highest "sticking with" rate, and E-Prime, SuperLab, MatLab, and DMDX all have 50%+ "sticking with" ratings. MatLab, SuperLab, and Presentation rank below that, ending with NESU, PsyScope classic, and SuperLab Pro. DMDX nets the highest satisfaction rating, with PsyScope X and E-Prime a smidge lower. Presentation and MatLab were both seen as notably difficult for novices. I use the free version of this all the time because its so simple. Rosenbrog 2 points 3 points 4 points 1 year ago. E-Prime and PsyScope were rated a shade harder for novices, and then from ERTS to SuperLab Pro to DMDX to NESU, novice-ease ratings dropped. FX23 'Psyscope Pro' multi-track and routing free synced oscilloscope (10) until 23 September by Batwaffel in AudioProductionDeals. SuperLab was seen as easiest for novices. Presentation and MatLab are notably the hardest of the commonly used packages. DMDX and NESU are seen as slightly harder. E-Prime, PsyScope, SuperLab, and ERTS are all rated as easy to build experiments with, and about equally so. There were 187 responses, but one was unanalyzable (the respondent did not specify a software package).Į-Prime is the most popular package of those surveyed, but the majority of folks are using either E-Prime, DMDX, or some flavor of PsyScope. This survey was done by Vic Ferreira et al at the Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego.
0 kommentar(er)
